[libata] Use ATA_UDMAx standard masks when filling driver's udma_mask info
The ATA_UDMAx masks are self-documenting, and far better than manually
writing in the hex mask.
Note that pata_it8213 mask differed from the comment. Added a FIXME there.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_via.c b/drivers/ata/sata_via.c
index e816965..a4c0832 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_via.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_via.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@
.flags = ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
.pio_mask = 0x1f,
.mwdma_mask = 0x07,
- .udma_mask = 0x7f,
+ .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6,
.port_ops = &vt6420_sata_ops,
};
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
.flags = ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
.pio_mask = 0x1f,
.mwdma_mask = 0x07,
- .udma_mask = 0x7f,
+ .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6,
.port_ops = &vt6421_sata_ops,
};
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
.flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
.pio_mask = 0x1f,
.mwdma_mask = 0,
- .udma_mask = 0x7f,
+ .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6,
.port_ops = &vt6421_pata_ops,
};