tree d5607d2f7a39567137e8488fdb53c915b02e0b35
parent e8206d2baa41a4c7cf4590929f8819f8309b564d
author Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> 1503957087 -0700
committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 1503961996 -0700

cpumask: fix spurious cpumask_of_node() on non-NUMA multi-node configs

When !NUMA, cpumask_of_node(@node) equals cpu_online_mask regardless of
@node.  The assumption seems that if !NUMA, there shouldn't be more than
one node and thus reporting cpu_online_mask regardless of @node is
correct.  However, that assumption was broken years ago to support
DISCONTIGMEM and whether a system has multiple nodes or not is
separately controlled by NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES.

This means that, on a system with !NUMA && NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES,
cpumask_of_node() will report cpu_online_mask for all possible nodes,
indicating that the CPUs are associated with multiple nodes which is an
impossible configuration.

This bug has been around forever but doesn't look like it has caused any
noticeable symptoms.  However, it triggers a WARN recently added to
workqueue to verify NUMA affinity configuration.

Fix it by reporting empty cpumask on non-zero nodes if !NUMA.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>