[ARM] fix naming of MODULE_START / MODULE_END
As of 73bdf0a60e607f4b8ecc5aec597105976565a84f, the kernel needs
to know where modules are located in the virtual address space.
On ARM, we located this region between MODULE_START and MODULE_END.
Unfortunately, everyone else calls it MODULES_VADDR and MODULES_END.
Update ARM to use the same naming, so is_vmalloc_or_module_addr()
can work properly. Also update the comment on mm/vmalloc.c to
reflect that ARM also places modules in a separate region from the
vmalloc space.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 8ba7540..34e5359 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@
/*
* Clear out all the mappings below the kernel image.
*/
- for (addr = 0; addr < MODULE_START; addr += PGDIR_SIZE)
+ for (addr = 0; addr < MODULES_VADDR; addr += PGDIR_SIZE)
pmd_clear(pmd_off_k(addr));
#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
map.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR & SECTION_MASK);
- map.virtual = MODULE_START;
+ map.virtual = MODULES_VADDR;
map.length = ((unsigned long)&_etext - map.virtual + ~SECTION_MASK) & SECTION_MASK;
map.type = MT_ROM;
create_mapping(&map);