ipv6: remove rt6i_peer_genid from rt6_info and its handler
6431cbc25f(Create a mechanism for upward inetpeer propagation into routes)
introduces these codes, but this mechanism is never enabled since
rt6i_peer_genid always is zero whether it is not assigned or assigned by
rt6_peer_genid(). After 5943634fc5 (ipv4: Maintain redirect and PMTU info
in struct rtable again), the ipv4 related codes of this mechanism has been
removed, I think we maybe able to remove them now.
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index c1cfcb7..6863f8b 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -321,13 +321,6 @@
}
}
-static atomic_t __rt6_peer_genid = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-
-static u32 rt6_peer_genid(void)
-{
- return atomic_read(&__rt6_peer_genid);
-}
-
void rt6_bind_peer(struct rt6_info *rt, int create)
{
struct inet_peer_base *base;
@@ -341,8 +334,6 @@
if (peer) {
if (!rt6_set_peer(rt, peer))
inet_putpeer(peer);
- else
- rt->rt6i_peer_genid = rt6_peer_genid();
}
}
@@ -1099,14 +1090,9 @@
if (rt->rt6i_genid != rt_genid(dev_net(rt->dst.dev)))
return NULL;
- if (rt->rt6i_node && (rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum == cookie)) {
- if (rt->rt6i_peer_genid != rt6_peer_genid()) {
- if (!rt6_has_peer(rt))
- rt6_bind_peer(rt, 0);
- rt->rt6i_peer_genid = rt6_peer_genid();
- }
+ if (rt->rt6i_node && (rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum == cookie))
return dst;
- }
+
return NULL;
}