writeback: fix a subtle race condition in I_DIRTY clearing
After invoking ->dirty_inode(), __mark_inode_dirty() does smp_mb() and
tests inode->i_state locklessly to see whether it already has all the
necessary I_DIRTY bits set. The comment above the barrier doesn't
contain any useful information - memory barriers can't ensure "changes
are seen by all cpus" by itself.
And it sure enough was broken. Please consider the following
scenario.
CPU 0 CPU 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
enters __writeback_single_inode()
grabs inode->i_lock
tests PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY which is clear
enters __set_page_dirty()
grabs mapping->tree_lock
sets PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY
releases mapping->tree_lock
leaves __set_page_dirty()
enters __mark_inode_dirty()
smp_mb()
sees I_DIRTY_PAGES set
leaves __mark_inode_dirty()
clears I_DIRTY_PAGES
releases inode->i_lock
Now @inode has dirty pages w/ I_DIRTY_PAGES clear. This doesn't seem
to lead to an immediately critical problem because requeue_inode()
later checks PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY instead of I_DIRTY_PAGES when
deciding whether the inode needs to be requeued for IO and there are
enough unintentional memory barriers inbetween, so while the inode
ends up with inconsistent I_DIRTY_PAGES flag, it doesn't fall off the
IO list.
The lack of explicit barrier may also theoretically affect the other
I_DIRTY bits which deal with metadata dirtiness. There is no
guarantee that a strong enough barrier exists between
I_DIRTY_[DATA]SYNC clearing and write_inode() writing out the dirtied
inode. Filesystem inode writeout path likely has enough stuff which
can behave as full barrier but it's theoretically possible that the
writeout may not see all the updates from ->dirty_inode().
Fix it by adding an explicit smp_mb() after I_DIRTY clearing. Note
that I_DIRTY_PAGES needs a special treatment as it always needs to be
cleared to be interlocked with the lockless test on
__mark_inode_dirty() side. It's cleared unconditionally and
reinstated after smp_mb() if the mapping still has dirty pages.
Also add comments explaining how and why the barriers are paired.
Lightly tested.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
1 file changed