tree b898076f1f2245dc435fa8e64b1ddac2b8424c7e
parent 211e4d434bd737be38aabad0247ce3da9964370e
author Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> 1335160715 +1000
committer Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> 1337030428 -0500

xfs: don't flush inodes from background inode reclaim

We already flush dirty inodes throug the AIL regularly, there is no reason
to have second thread compete with it and disturb the I/O pattern.  We still
do write inodes when doing a synchronous reclaim from the shrinker or during
unmount for now.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>