block, bfq: fix some typos in comments
Some of the comments in the bfq files had typos. This patch fixes them.
Signed-off-by: Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
index 60c1487..e7dc07c 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct bfq_service_tree {
* expiration. This peculiar definition allows for the following
* optimization, not yet exploited: while a given entity is still in
* service, we already know which is the best candidate for next
- * service among the other active entitities in the same parent
+ * service among the other active entities in the same parent
* entity. We can then quickly compare the timestamps of the
* in-service entity with those of such best candidate.
*
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ struct bfq_weight_counter {
*
* Unless cgroups are used, the weight value is calculated from the
* ioprio to export the same interface as CFQ. When dealing with
- * ``well-behaved'' queues (i.e., queues that do not spend too much
+ * "well-behaved" queues (i.e., queues that do not spend too much
* time to consume their budget and have true sequential behavior, and
* when there are no external factors breaking anticipation) the
* relative weights at each level of the cgroups hierarchy should be