powerpc/powernv: Use OPAL call for TCE kill on NVLink2
Add detection of NPU2 PHBs. NPU2/NVLink2 has a different register
layout for the TCE kill register therefore TCE invalidation should be
done via the OPAL call rather than using the register directly as it
is for PHB3 and NVLink1. This changes TCE invalidation to use the OPAL
call in the case of a NPU2 PHB model.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 939de0c..ddfa069 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -1953,7 +1953,12 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda2_tce_invalidate(struct iommu_table *tbl,
struct pnv_phb *phb = pe->phb;
unsigned int shift = tbl->it_page_shift;
- if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_NPU) {
+ /*
+ * NVLink1 can use the TCE kill register directly as
+ * it's the same as PHB3. NVLink2 is different and
+ * should go via the OPAL call.
+ */
+ if (phb->model == PNV_PHB_MODEL_NPU) {
/*
* The NVLink hardware does not support TCE kill
* per TCE entry so we have to invalidate
@@ -3674,6 +3679,8 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct device_node *np,
phb->model = PNV_PHB_MODEL_PHB3;
else if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "ibm,power8-npu-pciex"))
phb->model = PNV_PHB_MODEL_NPU;
+ else if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "ibm,power9-npu-pciex"))
+ phb->model = PNV_PHB_MODEL_NPU2;
else
phb->model = PNV_PHB_MODEL_UNKNOWN;