drm/i915/uc: Add explicit DISABLED state for firmware
We really need to have separate NOT_SUPPORTED state (for
lack of hardware support) and DISABLED state (to indicate
user decision) as we will have to take special steps even
if GuC firmware is now disabled but hardware exists and
could have been previously used.
v2: fix logic (Chris/CI)
v3: use proper check to avoid probe failure (CI)
v4: explain status transitions (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816205658.15020-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index e477889..1031fc1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2215,8 +2215,8 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
#define HAS_GT_UC(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_gt_uc)
/* Having GuC is not the same as using GuC */
-#define USES_GUC(dev_priv) intel_uc_supports_guc(&(dev_priv)->gt.uc)
-#define USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv) intel_uc_supports_guc_submission(&(dev_priv)->gt.uc)
+#define USES_GUC(dev_priv) intel_uc_uses_guc(&(dev_priv)->gt.uc)
+#define USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv) intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&(dev_priv)->gt.uc)
#define HAS_POOLED_EU(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_pooled_eu)