memcg: export memory cgroup's swappiness with mem_cgroup_swappiness()
Each memory cgroup has a 'swappiness' value which can be accessed by
get_swappiness(memcg). The major user is try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages()
and swappiness is passed by argument. It's propagated by scan_control.
get_swappiness() is a static function but some planned updates will need
to get swappiness from files other than memcontrol.c This patch exports
get_swappiness() as mem_cgroup_swappiness(). With this, we can remove the
argument of swapiness from try_to_free... and drop swappiness from
scan_control. only memcg uses it.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index febbc04..0563749 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -95,8 +95,6 @@
/* Can pages be swapped as part of reclaim? */
int may_swap;
- int swappiness;
-
int order;
/*
@@ -1770,6 +1768,13 @@
return shrink_inactive_list(nr_to_scan, zone, sc, priority, file);
}
+static int vmscan_swappiness(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
+ return vm_swappiness;
+ return mem_cgroup_swappiness(sc->mem_cgroup);
+}
+
/*
* Determine how aggressively the anon and file LRU lists should be
* scanned. The relative value of each set of LRU lists is determined
@@ -1830,8 +1835,8 @@
* With swappiness at 100, anonymous and file have the same priority.
* This scanning priority is essentially the inverse of IO cost.
*/
- anon_prio = sc->swappiness;
- file_prio = 200 - sc->swappiness;
+ anon_prio = vmscan_swappiness(sc);
+ file_prio = 200 - vmscan_swappiness(sc);
/*
* OK, so we have swap space and a fair amount of page cache
@@ -2220,7 +2225,6 @@
.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
.may_unmap = 1,
.may_swap = 1,
- .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
.order = order,
.mem_cgroup = NULL,
.nodemask = nodemask,
@@ -2244,7 +2248,6 @@
unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
- unsigned int swappiness,
struct zone *zone,
unsigned long *nr_scanned)
{
@@ -2254,7 +2257,6 @@
.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
.may_unmap = 1,
.may_swap = !noswap,
- .swappiness = swappiness,
.order = 0,
.mem_cgroup = mem,
};
@@ -2283,8 +2285,7 @@
unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
gfp_t gfp_mask,
- bool noswap,
- unsigned int swappiness)
+ bool noswap)
{
struct zonelist *zonelist;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
@@ -2294,7 +2295,6 @@
.may_unmap = 1,
.may_swap = !noswap,
.nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
- .swappiness = swappiness,
.order = 0,
.mem_cgroup = mem_cont,
.nodemask = NULL, /* we don't care the placement */
@@ -2445,7 +2445,6 @@
* we want to put equal scanning pressure on each zone.
*/
.nr_to_reclaim = ULONG_MAX,
- .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
.order = order,
.mem_cgroup = NULL,
};
@@ -2915,7 +2914,6 @@
.may_writepage = 1,
.nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim,
.hibernation_mode = 1,
- .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
.order = 0,
};
struct shrink_control shrink = {
@@ -3102,7 +3100,6 @@
.nr_to_reclaim = max_t(unsigned long, nr_pages,
SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
- .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
.order = order,
};
struct shrink_control shrink = {