| commit | 051627abe8995741f996e3931d899c0b08e503eb | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Jae Hoon Kim <kimjae@chromium.org> | Tue Sep 03 12:56:32 2019 -0700 |
| committer | chrome-bot <chrome-bot@chromium.org> | Fri Sep 27 18:30:08 2019 -0700 |
| tree | 170f7e778cff0daeb5a9aa8d8b1d9b7354097828 | |
| parent | f407f187af489b92c9a50a1f4ac8cf703b8fab56 [diff] |
update_engine: Parse and supply EOL date for Chrome From Omaha, the optional field |_eol_date| is to indicate the EOL of a device. Chrome side will leverage these values to display a notification. The value for |_eol_date| should be an integer value indicating the days from Unix Epoch date. If |_eol_date| does not exist in the Omaha response or have non-integer values, the default will fallback to |kEolDateInvalid|. BUG=chromium:998983 TEST=FEATURES="test" emerge-$B update_engine update_engine-client system_api TEST=test_that -b $B $IP autoupdate_EOL TEST=test_that -b $B $IP autoupdate_EOL.approaching_eol TEST=test_that -b $B $IP autoupdate_EOL.future_eol Cq-Depend:chromium:1783596, chromium:1811116 Change-Id: I2b1063873118ccf8fe22ba09a5961e27aa980c7b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1783897 Tested-by: Jae Hoon Kim <kimjae@chromium.org> Commit-Ready: ChromeOS CL Exonerator Bot <chromiumos-cl-exonerator@appspot.gserviceaccount.com> Legacy-Commit-Queue: Commit Bot <commit-bot@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Amin Hassani <ahassani@chromium.org>
System updates in more modern operating systems like Chrome OS and Android are called A/B updates, over-the-air (OTA) updates, seamless updates, or simply auto updates. In contrast to more primitive system updates (like Windows or macOS) where the system is booted into a special mode to override the system partitions with newer updates and may take several minutes or hours, A/B updates have several advantages including but not limited to:
In A/B update capable systems, each partition, such as the kernel or root (or other artifacts like DLC), has two copies. We call these two copies active (A) and inactive (B). The system is booted into the active partition (depending on which copy has the higher priority at boot time) and when a new update is available, it is written into the inactive partition. After a successful reboot, the previously inactive partition becomes active and the old active partition becomes inactive.
But everything starts with generating update payloads in (Google) servers for each new system image. Once the update payloads are generated, they are signed with specific keys and stored in a location known to an update server (Omaha).
When the updater client initiates an update (either periodically or user initiated), it first consults different device policies to see if the update check is allowed. For example, device policies can prevent an update check during certain times of a day or they require the update check time to be scattered throughout the day randomly, etc.
Once policies allow for the update check, the updater client sends a request to the update server (all this communication happens over HTTPS) and identifies its parameters like its Application ID, hardware ID, version, board, etc. Then if the update server decides to serve an update payload, it will respond with all the parameters needed to perform an update like the URLs to download the payloads, the metadata signatures, the payload size and hash, etc. The updater client continues communicating with the update server after different state changes, like reporting that it started to download the payload or it finished the update, or reports that the update failed with specific error codes, etc.
Each payload consists of two main sections: metadata and extra data. The metadata is basically a list of operations that should be performed for an update. The extra data contains the data blobs needed by some or all of these operations. The updater client first downloads the metadata and cryptographically verifies it using the provided signatures from the update server’s response. Once the metadata is verified as valid, the rest of the payload can easily be verified cryptographically (mostly through SHA256 hashes).
Next, the updater client marks the inactive partition as unbootable (because it needs to write the new updates into it). At this point the system cannot rollback to the inactive partition anymore.
Then, the updater client performs the operations defined in the metadata (in the order they appear in the metadata) and the rest of the payload is gradually downloaded when these operations require their data. Once an operation is finished its data is discarded. This eliminates the need for caching the entire payload before applying it. During this process the updater client periodically checkpoints the last operation performed so in the event of failure or system shutdown, etc. it can continue from the point it missed without redoing all operations from the beginning.
During the download, the updater client hashes the downloaded bytes and when the download finishes, it checks the payload signature (located at the end of the payload). If the signature cannot be verified, the update is rejected.
After the inactive partition is updated, the entire partition is re-read, hashed and compared to a hash value passed in the metadata to make sure the update was successfully written into the partition.
In the next step, the Postinstall process (if any) is called. The postinstall reconstructs the dm-verity tree hash of the ROOT partition and writes it at the end of the partition (after the last block of the file system). The postinstall can also perform any board specific or firmware update tasks necessary. If postinstall fails, the entire update is considered failed.
Then the updater client goes into a state that identifies the update has completed and the user needs to reboot the system. At this point, until the user reboots (or signs out), the updater client will not do any more system updates even if newer updates are available. However, it does continue to perform periodic update checks so we can have statistics on the number of active devices in the field.
After the update proved successful, the inactive partition is marked to have a higher priority (on a boot, a partition with higher priority is booted first). Once the user reboots the system, it will boot into the updated partition and it is marked as active. At this point, after the reboot, The updater client calls into the chromeos-setgoodkernel program. The program verifies the integrity of the system partitions using the dm-verity and marks the active partition as healthy. At this point the system is basically updated successfully.
The update_engine is a single-threaded daemon process that runs all the times. This process is the heart of the auto updates. It runs with lower priorities in the background and is one of the last processes to start after a system boot. Different clients (like Chrome or other services) can send requests for update checks to the update engine. The details of how requests are passed to the update engine is system dependent, but in Chrome OS it is D-Bus. Look at the D-Bus interface for a list of all available methods.
There are many resiliency features embedded in the update engine that makes auto updates robust including but not limited to:
The updater clients writes its active preferences in /var/lib/update_engine/prefs. These preferences help with tracking changes during the lifetime of the updater client and allows properly continuing the update process after failed attempts or crashes.
The core update engine code base in a Chromium OS checkout is located in src/aosp/system/update_engine fetching this repository.
In Chrome OS, devices are allowed to accept different policies from their managing organizations. Some of these policies affect how/when updates should be performed. For example, an organization may want to scatter the update checks during certain times of the day so as not to interfere with normal business. Within the update engine daemon, UpdateManager has the responsibility of loading such policies and making different decisions based on them. For example, some policies may allow the act of checking for updates to happen, while they prevent downloading the update payload. Or some policies don’t allow the update check within certain time frames, etc. Anything that relates to the Chrome OS update policies should be contained within the update_manager directory in the source code.
Chrome OS defines a concept for Rollback: Whenever a newly updated system does not work as it is intended, under certain circumstances the device can be rolled back to a previously working version. There are two types of rollback supported in Chrome OS: A (legacy, original) rollback and an enterprise rollback (I know, naming is confusing).
A normal rollback, which has existed for as long as Chrome OS had auto updater, is performed by switching the currently inactive partition into the active partition and rebooting into it. It is as simple as running a successful postinstall on the inactive partition, and rebooting the device. It is a feature used by Chrome that happens under certain circumstances. Of course rollback can’t happen if the inactive partition has been tampered with or has been nuked by the updater client to install an even newer update. Normally a rollback is followed by a Powerwash which clobbers the stateful partition.
Enterprise rollback is a new feature added to allow enterprise users to downgrade the installed image to an older version. It is very similar to a normal system update, except that an older update payload is downloaded and installed. There is no direct API for entering into the enterprise rollback. It is managed by the enterprise device policies only.
Developers should be careful when touching any rollback related feature and make sure they know exactly which of these two features they are trying to adapt.
Non-interactive updates are updates that are scheduled periodically by the update engine and happen in the background. Interactive updates, on the other hand, happen when a user specifically requests an update check (e.g. by clicking on “Check For Update” button in Chrome OS’s About page). Depending on the update servers policies, interactive updates have higher priority than non-interactive updates (by carrying marker hints). They may decide to not provide an update if they have busy server load, etc. There are other internal differences between these two types of updates too. For example, interactive updates try to install the update faster.
Forced updates are similar to interactive updates (initiated by some kind of user action), but they can also be configured to act as non-interactive. Since non-interactive updates happen periodically, a forced-non-interactive update causes a non-interactive update at the moment of the request, not at a later time. We can call a forced non-interactive update with:
update_engine_client --interactive=false --check_for_update
Many organizations might not have the external bandwidth requirements that system updates need for all their devices. To help with this, Chrome OS can act as a payload server to other client devices in the same network subnet. This is basically a peer-to-peer update system that allows the devices to download the update payloads from other devices in the network. This has to be enabled explicitly in the organization through device policies and specific network configurations to be enabled for P2P updates to work. Regardless of the location of update payloads, all update requests go through update servers in HTTPS.
Check out the P2P update related code for both the server and the client side.
The updater client has the capability to download the payloads using Ethernet, WiFi, or Cellular networks depending on which one the device is connected to. Downloading over Cellular networks will prompt permission from the user as it can consume a considerable amount of data.
In Chrome OS the update_engine logs are located in /var/log/update_engine directory. Whenever update_engine starts, it starts a new log file with the current data-time format in the log file’s name (update_engine.log-DATE-TIME). Many log files can be seen in /var/log/update_engine after a few restarts of the update engine or after the system reboots. The latest active log is symlinked to /var/log/update_engine.log.
The update payload generation is the process of converting a set of partitions/files into a format that is both understandable by the updater client (especially if it's much older versions) and is securely verifiable. This process involves breaking the input partitions into smaller components and compressing them in order to help with network bandwidth when downloading the payloads.
For each generated payload, there is corresponding properties file which contains the metadata information of the payload in JSON format. Normally the file is located in the same location as the generated payload and its file name is the same as the payload file name plus .json postfix. e.g. /path/to/payload.bin and /path/to/payload.bin.json. This properties file is necessary in order to do any kind of auto update in cros flash, AU autotests, etc. Similarly the updater server uses this file to dispatch the payload properties to the updater clients.
Once update payloads are generated, their original images cannot be changed anymore otherwise the update payloads may not be able to be applied.
delta_generator is a tool with a wide range of options for generating different types of update payloads. Its code is located in update_engine/payload_generator. This directory contains all the source code related to mechanics of generating an update payload. None of the files in this directory should be included or used in any other library/executable other than the delta_generator which means this directory does not get compiled into the rest of the update engine tools.
However, it is not recommended to use delta_generator directly. To manually generate payloads easier, cros_generate_update_payloads should be used. Most of the higher level policies and tools for generating payloads reside as a library in chromite/lib/paygen. Whenever calls to the update payload generation API are needed, this library should be used instead.
Each update payload file has a specific structure defined in the table below:
| Field | Size (bytes) | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magic Number | 4 | char[4] | Magic string "CrAU" identifying this is an update payload. |
| Major Version | 8 | uint64 | Payload major version number. |
| Manifest Size | 8 | uint64 | Manifest size in bytes. |
| Manifest Signature Size | 4 | uint32 | Manifest signature blob size in bytes (only in major version 2). |
| Manifest | Varies | DeltaArchiveManifest | The list of operations to be performed. |
| Manifest Signature | Varies | Signatures | The signature of the first five fields. There could be multiple signatures if the key has changed. |
| Payload Data | Varies | List of raw or compressed data blobs | The list of binary blobs used by operations in the metadata. |
| Payload Signature Size | Varies | uint64 | The size of the payload signature. |
| Payload Signature | Varies | Signatures | The signature of the entire payload except the metadata signature. There could be multiple signatures if the key has changed. |
There are two types of payload: Full and Delta. A full payload is generated solely from the target image (the image we want to update to) and has all the data necessary to update the inactive partition. Hence, full payloads can be quite large in size. A delta payload, on the other hand, is a differential update generated by comparing the source image (the active partitions) and the target image and producing the diffs between these two images. It is basically a differential update similar to applications like diff or bsdiff. Hence, updating the system using the delta payloads requires the system to read parts of the active partition in order to update the inactive partition (or reconstruct the target partition). The delta payloads are significantly smaller than the full payloads. The structure of the payload is equal for both types.
Payload generation is quite resource intensive and its tools are implemented with high parallelism.
A full payload is generated by breaking the partition into 2MiB (configurable) chunks and either compressing them using bzip2 or XZ algorithms or keeping it as raw data depending on which produces smaller data. Full payloads are much larger in comparison to delta payloads hence require longer download time if the network bandwidth is limited. On the other hand, full payloads are a bit faster to apply because the system doesn’t need to read data from the source partition.
Delta payloads are generated by looking at both the source and target images data on a file and metadata basis (more precisely, the file system level on each appropriate partition). The reason we can generate delta payloads is that Chrome OS partitions are read only. So with high certainty we can assume the active partitions on the client’s device is bit-by-bit equal to the original partitions generated in the image generation/signing phase. The process for generating a delta payload is roughly as follows:
ZERO operation for them. ZERO operation basically discards the associated blocks (depending on the implementation).SOURCE_COPY operation.REPLACE, REPLACE_XZ, or REPLACE_BZ operation for its data blocks depending on which one generates a smaller data blob.SOURCE_BSDIFF or PUFFDIFF operation depending on which one generates a smaller data blob. These two operations produce binary diffs between a source and target data blob. (Look at bsdiff and puffin for details of such binary differential programs!)Full payloads can only contain REPLACE, REPLACE_BZ, and REPLACE_XZ operations. Delta payloads can contain any operations.
The major and minor versions specify the update payload file format and the capability of the updater client to accept certain types of update payloads respectively. These numbers are hard coded in the updater client.
Major version is basically the update payload file version specified in the update payload file specification above (second field). Each updater client supports a range of major versions. Currently, there are only two major versions: 1, and 2. And both Chrome OS and Android are on major version 2 (major version 1 is being deprecated). Whenever there are new additions that cannot be fitted in the Manifest protobuf, we need to uprev the major version. Upreving major version should be done with utmost care because older clients do not know how to handle the newer versions. Any major version uprev in Chrome OS should be associated with a GoldenEye stepping stone.
Minor version defines the capability of the updater client to accept certain operations or perform certain actions. Each updater client supports a range of minor versions. For example, the updater client with minor version 4 (or less) does not know how to handle a PUFFDIFF operation. So when generating a delta payload for an image which has an updater client with minor version 4 (or less) we cannot produce PUFFDIFF operation for it. The payload generation process looks at the source image’s minor version to decide the type of operations it supports and only a payload that confirms to those restrictions. Similarly, if there is a bug in a client with a specific minor version, an uprev in the minor version helps with avoiding to generate payloads that cause that bug to manifest. However, upreving minor versions is quite expensive too in terms of maintainability and it can be error prone. So one should practice caution when making such a change.
Minor versions are irrelevant in full payloads. Full payloads should always be able to be applied for very old clients. The reason is that the updater clients may not send their current version, so if we had different types of full payloads, we would not have known which version to serve to the client.
Update payloads can be signed (with private/public key pairs) for use in production or be kept unsigned for use in testing. Tools like delta_generator help with generating metadata and payload hashes or signing the payloads given private keys.
update_payload contains a set of python scripts mostly to validate payload generation and application. We normally test the update payloads using an actual device (live tests). brillo_update_payload script can be used to generate and test applying of a payload on a host device machine. These tests can be viewed as dynamic tests without the need for an actual device. Other update_payload scripts (like check_update_payload) can be used to statically check that a payload is in the correct state and its application works correctly. These scripts actually apply the payload statically without running the code in payload_consumer.
Postinstall is a process called after the updater client writes the new image artifacts to the inactive partitions. One of postinstall's main responsibilities is to recreate the dm-verity tree hash at the end of the root partition. Among other things, it installs new firmware updates or any board specific processes. Postinstall runs in separate chroot inside the newly installed partition. So it is quite separated from the rest of the active running system. Anything that needs to be done after an update and before the device is rebooted, should be implemented inside the postinstall.
You can build update_engine the same as other platform applications:
(chroot) $ emerge-${BOARD} update_engine
or to build without the source copy:
(chroot) $ cros_workon_make --board=${BOARD} update_engine
After a change in the update_engine daemon, either build an image and install the image on the device using cros flash, etc. or use cros deploy to only install the update_engine service on the device:
(chroot) $ cros deploy update_engine
You need to restart the update_engine daemon in order to see the affected changes:
# SSH into the device. restart update-engine # with a dash not underscore.
Other payload generation tools like delta_generator are board agnostic and only available in the SDK. So in order to make any changes to the delta_generator, you should build the SDK:
# Do it only once to start building the 9999 ebuild from ToT. (chroot) $ cros_workon --host start update_engine (chroot) $ sudo emerge update_engine
If you make any changes to the D-Bus interface make sure system_api, update_engine-client, and update_engine packages are marked to build from 9999 ebuild and then build both packages in that order:
(chroot) $ emerge-${BOARD} system_api update_engine-client update_engine
If you make any changes to update_engine protobufs in the system_api, build the system_api package first.
Running unit tests similar to other platforms:
(chroot) $ FEATURES=test emerge-<board> update_engine
or
(chroot) $ cros_workon_make --board=<board> --test update_engine
or
(chroot) $ cros_run_unit_tests --board ${BOARD} --test --packages update_engine
The above commands run all the unit tests, but update_engine package is quite large and it takes a long time to run all the unit tests. To run all unit tests in a test class run:
(chroot) $ FEATURES=test \ P2_TEST_FILTER="*OmahaRequestActionTest.*-*RunAsRoot*" \ emerge-amd64-generic update_engine
To run one exact unit test fixture (e.g. MultiAppUpdateTest), run:
(chroot) $ FEATURES=test \ P2_TEST_FILTER="*OmahaRequestActionTest.MultiAppUpdateTest-*RunAsRoot*" \ emerge-amd64-generic update_engine
To run update_payload unit tests enter update_engine/scripts directory and run the desired unittest.py files.
There are different methods to initiate an update:
update_engine_client program. There are a few configurations you can do.autest in the crosh. Mainly used by the QA team and is not intended to be used by any other team.cros flash. It internally uses the update_engine to flash a device with a given image.cros_au API in the Dev Server code), that has the information like the IP address of your Chromebook and where the update payloads are located to the Dev Server to start an update on your device (Warning: complicated to do, not recommended).update_engine_client is a client application that can help initiate an update or get more information about the status of the updater client. It has several options like initiating an interactive vs. non-interactive update, changing channels, getting the current status of update process, doing a rollback, changing the Omaha URL to download the payload (the most important one), etc.
update_engine daemon reads the /etc/lsb-release file on the device to identify different update parameters like the updater server (Omaha) URL, the current channel, etc. However, to override any of these parameters, create the file /mnt/stateful_partition/etc/lsb-release with desired customized parameters. For example, this can be used to point to a developer version of the update server and allow the update_engine to schedule a periodic update form that specific server.
If you have some changes in the protocol that communicates with Omaha, but you don’t have those changes in the update server, or you have some specific payloads that do not exist on the production update server you can use Nebraska to help with doing an update.
When changing the update engine source code be extra careful about these things:
At each release cycle we should be able to generate full and delta payloads that can correctly be applied to older devices that run older versions of the update engine client. So for example, removing or not passing arguments in the metadata proto file might break older clients. Or passing operations that are not understood in older clients will break them. Whenever changing anything in the payload generation process, ask yourself this question: Would it work on older clients? If not, do I need to control it with minor versions or any other means.
Especially regarding enterprise rollback, a newer updater client should be able to accept an older update payload. Normally this happens using a full payload, but care should be taken in order to not break this compatibility.
When creating a change in the update engine, think about 5 years from now:
If a feature can be implemented from server side, Do NOT implement it in the client updater. Because the client updater can be fragile at points and small mistakes can have catastrophic consequences. For example, if a bug is introduced in the updater client that causes it to crash right before checking for update and we can't quite catch this bug early in the release process, then the production devices which have already moved to the new buggy system, may no longer receive automatic updates anymore. So, always think if the feature is being implemented can be done form the server side (with potentially minimal changes to the client updater)? Or can the feature be moved to another service with minimal interface to the updater client. Answering these questions will pay off greatly in the future.
The current update engine code base is used in many projects like Android. We sync the code base among these two projects frequently. Try to not break Android or other systems that share the update engine code. Whenever landing a change, always think about whether Android needs that change:
As a basic measure, if adding/removing/renaming code, make sure to change both build.gn and Android.bp. Do not bring Chrome OS specific code (for example other libraries that live in system_api or dlcservice) into the common code of update_engine. Try to separate these concerns using best software engineering practices.
Chrome OS tracks the Android code as an upstream branch. To merge the Android code to Chrome OS (or vice versa) just do a git merge of that branch into Chrome OS, test it using whatever means and upload a merge commit.
repo start merge-aosp git merge --no-ff --strategy=recursive -X patience cros/upstream repo upload --cbr --no-verify .