atomic64_test: simplify the #ifdef for atomic64_dec_if_positive() test
Introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE and use this instead
of the multitude of #if defined() checks in atomic64_test.c
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/lib/atomic64_test.c b/lib/atomic64_test.c
index cb99b91..00bca22 100644
--- a/lib/atomic64_test.c
+++ b/lib/atomic64_test.c
@@ -114,8 +114,7 @@
r += one;
BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
-#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_MIPS) || defined(CONFIG_PPC) || \
- defined(CONFIG_S390) || defined(_ASM_GENERIC_ATOMIC64_H) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
INIT(onestwos);
BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (onestwos - 1));
r -= one;
@@ -129,7 +128,7 @@
BUG_ON(atomic64_dec_if_positive(&v) != (-one - one));
BUG_ON(v.counter != r);
#else
-#warning Please implement atomic64_dec_if_positive for your architecture, and add it to the IF above
+#warning Please implement atomic64_dec_if_positive for your architecture and select the above Kconfig symbol
#endif
INIT(onestwos);