cpufreq: Avoid false-positive WARN_ON()s in cpufreq_update_policy()
CPU notifications from the firmware coming in when cpufreq is
suspended cause cpufreq_update_current_freq() to return 0 which
triggers the WARN_ON() in cpufreq_update_policy() for no reason.
Avoid that by checking cpufreq_suspended before calling
cpufreq_update_current_freq().
Fixes: c9d9c929e674 (cpufreq: Abort cpufreq_update_current_freq() for cpufreq_suspended set)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 4.6+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.6+
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 9009295..5617c70 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2261,6 +2261,10 @@
* -> ask driver for current freq and notify governors about a change
*/
if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
+ if (cpufreq_suspended) {
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
new_policy.cur = cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy);
if (WARN_ON(!new_policy.cur)) {
ret = -EIO;