oom: move oom_adj value from task_struct to signal_struct

Currently, OOM logic callflow is here.

    __out_of_memory()
        select_bad_process()            for each task
            badness()                   calculate badness of one task
                oom_kill_process()      search child
                    oom_kill_task()     kill target task and mm shared tasks with it

example, process-A have two thread, thread-A and thread-B and it have very
fat memory and each thread have following oom_adj and oom_score.

     thread-A: oom_adj = OOM_DISABLE, oom_score = 0
     thread-B: oom_adj = 0,           oom_score = very-high

Then, select_bad_process() select thread-B, but oom_kill_task() refuse
kill the task because thread-A have OOM_DISABLE.  Thus __out_of_memory()
call select_bad_process() again.  but select_bad_process() select the same
task.  It mean kernel fall in livelock.

The fact is, select_bad_process() must select killable task.  otherwise
OOM logic go into livelock.

And root cause is, oom_adj shouldn't be per-thread value.  it should be
per-process value because OOM-killer kill a process, not thread.  Thus
This patch moves oomkilladj (now more appropriately named oom_adj) from
struct task_struct to struct signal_struct.  it naturally prevent
select_bad_process() choose wrong task.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index da4c342..630b77f 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@
 	unsigned long points, cpu_time, run_time;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
 	struct task_struct *child;
+	int oom_adj = p->signal->oom_adj;
+
+	if (oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE)
+		return 0;
 
 	task_lock(p);
 	mm = p->mm;
@@ -148,15 +152,15 @@
 		points /= 8;
 
 	/*
-	 * Adjust the score by oomkilladj.
+	 * Adjust the score by oom_adj.
 	 */
-	if (p->oomkilladj) {
-		if (p->oomkilladj > 0) {
+	if (oom_adj) {
+		if (oom_adj > 0) {
 			if (!points)
 				points = 1;
-			points <<= p->oomkilladj;
+			points <<= oom_adj;
 		} else
-			points >>= -(p->oomkilladj);
+			points >>= -(oom_adj);
 	}
 
 #ifdef DEBUG
@@ -251,7 +255,7 @@
 			*ppoints = ULONG_MAX;
 		}
 
-		if (p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
+		if (p->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE)
 			continue;
 
 		points = badness(p, uptime.tv_sec);
@@ -304,7 +308,7 @@
 		}
 		printk(KERN_INFO "[%5d] %5d %5d %8lu %8lu %3d     %3d %s\n",
 		       p->pid, __task_cred(p)->uid, p->tgid, mm->total_vm,
-		       get_mm_rss(mm), (int)task_cpu(p), p->oomkilladj,
+		       get_mm_rss(mm), (int)task_cpu(p), p->signal->oom_adj,
 		       p->comm);
 		task_unlock(p);
 	} while_each_thread(g, p);
@@ -359,18 +363,9 @@
 	 * change to NULL at any time since we do not hold task_lock(p).
 	 * However, this is of no concern to us.
 	 */
-
-	if (mm == NULL)
+	if (!mm || p->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE)
 		return 1;
 
-	/*
-	 * Don't kill the process if any threads are set to OOM_DISABLE
-	 */
-	do_each_thread(g, q) {
-		if (q->mm == mm && q->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
-			return 1;
-	} while_each_thread(g, q);
-
 	__oom_kill_task(p, 1);
 
 	/*
@@ -394,8 +389,9 @@
 
 	if (printk_ratelimit()) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s invoked oom-killer: "
-			"gfp_mask=0x%x, order=%d, oomkilladj=%d\n",
-			current->comm, gfp_mask, order, current->oomkilladj);
+			"gfp_mask=0x%x, order=%d, oom_adj=%d\n",
+			current->comm, gfp_mask, order,
+			current->signal->oom_adj);
 		task_lock(current);
 		cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(current);
 		task_unlock(current);