JDWP: fix setting multiple breakpoints in the same method
When setting multiple breakpoints in the same method, we were
incorrectly setting the deoptimization kind of all the breakpoints
set after a first breakpoint. This resulted in incorrect
deoptimization/undeoptimization and even an abort. This was caught
by running the debugger with sanity checks enabled with libartd.so.
We now set next breakpoints with the deoptimization kind of the first
existing breakpoint (if any) so we trigger right [un]deoptimization
when adding or removing a breakpoint.
Bug: 18782753
Bug: 18651686
Change-Id: Idf36ede73302fba83a154052bef701bedc8bc726
diff --git a/runtime/debugger.cc b/runtime/debugger.cc
index 7cc52c3..a61b271 100644
--- a/runtime/debugger.cc
+++ b/runtime/debugger.cc
@@ -3235,8 +3235,12 @@
}
}
+// Returns the deoptimization kind required to set a breakpoint in a method.
+// If a breakpoint has already been set, we also return the first breakpoint
+// through the given 'existing_brkpt' pointer.
static DeoptimizationRequest::Kind GetRequiredDeoptimizationKind(Thread* self,
- mirror::ArtMethod* m)
+ mirror::ArtMethod* m,
+ const Breakpoint** existing_brkpt)
SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED(Locks::mutator_lock_) {
if (!Dbg::RequiresDeoptimization()) {
// We already run in interpreter-only mode so we don't need to deoptimize anything.
@@ -3244,12 +3248,14 @@
<< PrettyMethod(m);
return DeoptimizationRequest::kNothing;
}
- const Breakpoint* existing_breakpoint;
+ const Breakpoint* first_breakpoint;
{
ReaderMutexLock mu(self, *Locks::breakpoint_lock_);
- existing_breakpoint = FindFirstBreakpointForMethod(m);
+ first_breakpoint = FindFirstBreakpointForMethod(m);
+ *existing_brkpt = first_breakpoint;
}
- if (existing_breakpoint == nullptr) {
+
+ if (first_breakpoint == nullptr) {
// There is no breakpoint on this method yet: we need to deoptimize. If this method may be
// inlined, we deoptimize everything; otherwise we deoptimize only this method.
// Note: IsMethodPossiblyInlined goes into the method verifier and may cause thread suspension.
@@ -3284,7 +3290,7 @@
// There is at least one breakpoint for this method: we don't need to deoptimize.
// Let's check that all breakpoints are configured the same way for deoptimization.
VLOG(jdwp) << "Breakpoint already set: no deoptimization is required";
- DeoptimizationRequest::Kind deoptimization_kind = existing_breakpoint->GetDeoptimizationKind();
+ DeoptimizationRequest::Kind deoptimization_kind = first_breakpoint->GetDeoptimizationKind();
if (kIsDebugBuild) {
ReaderMutexLock mu(self, *Locks::breakpoint_lock_);
SanityCheckExistingBreakpoints(m, deoptimization_kind);
@@ -3300,7 +3306,9 @@
mirror::ArtMethod* m = FromMethodId(location->method_id);
DCHECK(m != nullptr) << "No method for method id " << location->method_id;
- const DeoptimizationRequest::Kind deoptimization_kind = GetRequiredDeoptimizationKind(self, m);
+ const Breakpoint* existing_breakpoint = nullptr;
+ const DeoptimizationRequest::Kind deoptimization_kind =
+ GetRequiredDeoptimizationKind(self, m, &existing_breakpoint);
req->SetKind(deoptimization_kind);
if (deoptimization_kind == DeoptimizationRequest::kSelectiveDeoptimization) {
req->SetMethod(m);
@@ -3312,7 +3320,15 @@
{
WriterMutexLock mu(self, *Locks::breakpoint_lock_);
- gBreakpoints.push_back(Breakpoint(m, location->dex_pc, deoptimization_kind));
+ // If there is at least one existing breakpoint on the same method, the new breakpoint
+ // must have the same deoptimization kind than the existing breakpoint(s).
+ DeoptimizationRequest::Kind breakpoint_deoptimization_kind;
+ if (existing_breakpoint != nullptr) {
+ breakpoint_deoptimization_kind = existing_breakpoint->GetDeoptimizationKind();
+ } else {
+ breakpoint_deoptimization_kind = deoptimization_kind;
+ }
+ gBreakpoints.push_back(Breakpoint(m, location->dex_pc, breakpoint_deoptimization_kind));
VLOG(jdwp) << "Set breakpoint #" << (gBreakpoints.size() - 1) << ": "
<< gBreakpoints[gBreakpoints.size() - 1];
}